首页> 外文OA文献 >On-site experimental study of HCFC-22 substitution with HFCs refrigerants
【2h】

On-site experimental study of HCFC-22 substitution with HFCs refrigerants

机译:用HFC制冷剂替代HCFC-22的现场实验研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The European Regulation no 2037/2000 has banned manufacturing HCFC refrigerants from January 1st 2010, although its use is allowed up to 2015 if the fluids come from a recycling process. This situation creates the need for developing new working fluids to replace the HCFC in the refrigeration plants now in operation. Among all the HCFCs the R22 is the most widely used in a wide range of applications, especially in air conditioning. This paper presents the results of an experimental analysis comparing the performance of a vapour compression refrigerating unit operating with R22, and its performance in comparison to some HFCs fluids, substituting the former. In particular, the plant working efficiency was first tested with R22 and then with three HFC fluids: R417A, R407C and R404A. The investigation verified that the performance with HFCs refrigerants did not result as efficient as when using R22.
机译:欧洲第2037/2000号法规从2010年1月1日起禁止制造HCFC制冷剂,但如果流体来自回收过程,则在2015年之前仍允许使用。这种情况导致需要开发新的工作流体来代替目前正在运行的制冷设备中的HCFC。在所有HCFC中,R22在各种应用中使用最广泛,尤其是在空调中。本文介绍了一项实验分析的结果,该结果比较了使用R22运行的蒸汽压缩制冷机组的性能,以及与某些HFC流体(替代前者)相比的性能。特别是,首先使用R22,然后使用三种HFC流体:R417A,R407C和R404A对工厂的工作效率进行测试。调查证实,使用HFC制冷剂的性能不如使用R22时高效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号